The person's behaviors
are listed
and directly readable

HRD

HRD and responsible for executive management in the company, I am also a volunteer in the association TIGcRE which offers support to juniors and seniors wishing to form a tandem to create a company.

After several trials of different recruitment tools, my choice came down to Intelli7 in 2001.

Recruitment is a process involving several stages and above all several players: the candidate, the recruiter, and the manager of the team the candidate is to join.

At each stage, Intelli7 can accompany the various protagonists with the advantage of understanding the process, clarifying what is happening between the interlocutors and discovering the candidate in his or her functioning.

Everything is important: the job description, what the candidate can do, what he or she will actually do, how he or she will fit into the future team. Intelli7 provides a detailed and relevant analysis of these different aspects, giving leads for action and moving forward together the players in the recruitment process.

Intelli7 has enabled me to develop my confidence and the image of HR within the group, thanks to the ability it has given me to respond to all types of HR situations.
My internal positioning has been accepted and facilitated by the use of Intelli7 in the issues raised.

Conseil en organisation et management

My expertise lies in structuring fast-growing SMEs. For the managers of these companies, it's all about proving oneself in order to survive. Everything moves very fast, and we can be confronted with poorly explained situations, often linked to human dysfunctions, which act as a brake on development.

In this type of context, the Intelli7 model, which is highly visual and easy for anyone to grasp without being an expert, enabled me to easily capture the attention of managers and get them to usefully reflect on the question of matching human resources to the company's needs: how do we know if we have the right man at the right place?

I've used Intelli7 in a variety of ways, but when it comes to structuring companies of this type, I'd like to mention two that have generally made a real difference.

The first consisted, through a better understanding of the behaviors sought, in limiting decisions calling on the garbage can model.

This often unsuccessful strategy leads to recruiting for high-level positions, without too much formality or discernment, a person from the immediate environment. When the scope of recruitment is broadened and the desired behaviors have been clearly identified, the company has a better chance of recruiting an employee who will effectively support its development strategy.

The second type of action was to help reposition certain employees who were unsuitable or suffering in their jobs.

With the help of coaching based on a profile, we can help people to better understand their preferred operating modes and thus find their place; particularly on the manager/expert axis.

This helps repair a number of mistakes often made right from the start of the company.