Research and development
in Intelli7®

HR Consultant - Professional Coach

I certified with Intelli7 at the end of 2016, at the same time as I completed my coaching certification. After more than 15 years in industry as an HRM/HRD, I thought I had developed a good understanding of people.

I came to acquire methods and tools to better deal with the issues we frequently encounter in HR.

Intelli7's strength lies in its ability to objectify and characterize what is more often than not the domain of impressions that are more or less confused and more or less shared by stakeholders. And the sooner we have an informed, shared diagnosis, the faster we can resolve the problem.

The other strength of Intelli7 is that it's a real Swiss Army knife, that can be adapted to both individual and collective problems.

I use it for recruitment, managerial development or Talent development, as well as for executive committee support or organizational change management.

Intelli7 helps me to quickly diagnose and propose a structured approach that responds to the issues identified.

Many of my customers have already told me: I could see that something was wrong, but I couldn't formulate the problem. Your intervention is exceptional.

My references:
Alfa Laval, MBDA, industrial SMEs, consulting firms, associations in the medical-social sector

Conseil en organisation et management

My expertise lies in structuring fast-growing SMEs. For the managers of these companies, it's all about proving oneself in order to survive. Everything moves very fast, and we can be confronted with poorly explained situations, often linked to human dysfunctions, which act as a brake on development.

In this type of context, the Intelli7 model, which is highly visual and easy for anyone to grasp without being an expert, enabled me to easily capture the attention of managers and get them to usefully reflect on the question of matching human resources to the company's needs: how do we know if we have the right man at the right place?

I've used Intelli7 in a variety of ways, but when it comes to structuring companies of this type, I'd like to mention two that have generally made a real difference.

The first consisted, through a better understanding of the behaviors sought, in limiting decisions calling on the garbage can model.

This often unsuccessful strategy leads to recruiting for high-level positions, without too much formality or discernment, a person from the immediate environment. When the scope of recruitment is broadened and the desired behaviors have been clearly identified, the company has a better chance of recruiting an employee who will effectively support its development strategy.

The second type of action was to help reposition certain employees who were unsuitable or suffering in their jobs.

With the help of coaching based on a profile, we can help people to better understand their preferred operating modes and thus find their place; particularly on the manager/expert axis.

This helps repair a number of mistakes often made right from the start of the company.